Induratio Penis Plastica (Peyronie's disease) therapy for UGRS

Two terms that have been associated with each other nationally and internationally for many years. Doctors at the UGRS have not only become known for the fact that we perform the removal of the focus of the disease (so-called grafting) with subsequent reconstruction to a high standard, as recommended in the EAU guidelines. But also for our tireless efforts to ensure that our patients receive at least partial reimbursement from their health insurance companies. And that they are not referred to more disadvantageous grafting operations.

Unfortunately, this is not possible for statutory patients due to the strict separation of the statutory system from the private system in Germany. We can only treat these patients on a self-pay basis.

Please read our patient information below:

Who will treat me in Darmstadt?

Your doctors in the Induratio section:

Photos in update

(In the middle: Prof. Poblador; details about our doctors can be found here)

Contents

What is Peyronie's disease (Induratio Penis Plastica)?

Induratio Penis Plastica (Peyronie’s disease), also known as Peyronie’s disease, is a benign disease of the penis. A hardening (plaque) forms in the tissue of the erectile tissue, which often leads to a curvature. It was described as early as the 16th century and then in detail in 1743 by the French physician François de la Peyronie.

How common is penile curvature?

Around 5% of men are affected – mainly between the ages of 40 and 60. However, young men can also develop induratio penis plastica (Peyronie’s disease).

How is Peyronie's disease diagnosed?

Imaging diagnosis using MRI and differentiation from similar diseases is often difficult due to the lack of experience of the radiologist and urologist assessing this disease (Citation: 13).

The standard diagnostic procedures include:

Supplementary methods are used, for example:

What are the causes and symptoms of Peyronie's disease?

The exact causes are not fully understood. It is often caused by a connective tissue disorder, such as Dupuytren’s contracture, a disease of the hand that leads to restricted movement of the fingers. Other genetic predispositions, previous operations in the pelvic area (e.g. prostate removal) or successive injuries can also play a role.

The molecular causes of the development of the disease are still unclear (Citation: 14).

Typical physical symptoms are

The physical symptoms can be varied and are not present in the same way in all patients (Citation: 1, 2, 4, 5)

Important: Not everyone affected has a visible curvature. Some only suffer from erection problems or changes in shape.

UGRS.blog

In our UGRS.Blog we deal with developments and provide insights on many topics.

What psychological problems are caused by induratio penis plastica (Peyronie's disease)?

The psychological symptoms of induratio penis plastica are still underestimated.

The psychological effects of induratio penis plastica are serious, but still under-researched in medicine. Urologists and andrologists in the general healthcare system often still pay too little attention to these psychological stresses (Citation: 9, 15).

The consequences are:

Induratio Penis Plastica (Peyronie’s disease) patients with significant psychological problems often have to fight for acceptance of these burdens by their environment (Citation: 9, 15)

How does Peyronie's disease progress over time?

Induratio Penis Plastica (Peyronie’s disease) usually begins with an unnoticed inflammation in the tissue of the penis. This develops into a scar (plaque), which can enlarge over months or years – especially due to mechanical stress such as erections or interaction. Unfortunately, spontaneous healing is very rare. The plaque can lead to increasing curvature, shortening and erectile dysfunction (Citation: 2, 4).

Without treatment, the condition almost always gets worse. Many sufferers report severe losses in their relationships and self-esteem.

How can I stop an aggravation?

Patients with Peyronie’s disease often also suffer from Dupuytren’s contracture. And vice versa (Citation: 17, 18, 19).

If patients suffer from one of these diseases, they should definitely have the other disease checked in good time. This gives them the chance of early treatment and therefore the chance of better results.

In general, in our opinion and based on our extensive experience, early treatment is necessary to stop the condition from worsening.

Since there is no reliably effective conservative therapy (Citation: 16), we do not believe that it makes sense to let valuable time pass by trying conservative therapy.

What non-surgical treatments are available for Peyronie's disease?

In the early stages, attempts can be made to treat Peyronie’s disease with medication or physical therapy (e.g. shock waves or injections). The aim is to slow down the progression of hardening. Success depends heavily on the timing of the treatment.

The reality of conservative therapies

What does “no better than placebo” mean?

The placebo effect explained: A placebo is a sham treatment without an active ingredient. If patients believe that they are receiving an effective medication, their symptoms can improve through this expectation alone. A real therapy must work significantly better than this psychological effect.

New processes raise hopes

New, non-surgical treatment methods are regularly developed and tested. So far, unfortunately, without the desired effect. Hope therefore lies in the future.

We do not recommend the use of conservative methods as an attempt to treat severe cases because none of the conservative methods have so far shown results that have convinced us as experts.

Our opinion is based on the scientific findings mentioned above.

Early action is important

As you have experienced, there is unfortunately no effective conservative therapy.

In our extensive experience, especially as a Tertiary Medical Center for Induratio Penis Plastica (Peyronie’s disease), waiting worsens the symptoms and in many cases complicates the treatment of this complex disease.

Our opinion is based on the scientific findings mentioned above.

Spontaneous healing is rare

There are also only a few cases of spontaneous healing, i.e. cases in which the disease goes away on its own. However, it is very rare

When does surgery make sense for Peyronie's disease and what techniques are available?

If the penis is severely curved, painful or the erection decreases significantly, surgery can help. Depending on the severity, various procedures are theoretically possible – such as removal of the plaques with subsequent grafting, tissue implants or the so-called Nesbit technique.

Modern surgical techniques of grafting can often restore the shape and function of the penis well. A precise diagnosis and individual consultation are important.

What surgical options are there for Peyronie's disease - and which one makes sense?

Important note:

The surgical treatment of Peyronie’s disease is extremely complex and requires a physician experienced in reconstructive surgery. This is the only way to minimize the risks and achieve good results (Citation: 11, 12).

There are several theoretical surgical methods for treating induratio penis plastica (Peyronie’s disease). Our technique, the grafting technique, completely removes the focus of the disease itself and, as a rule, all associated symptoms. The other known techniques each treat only a single symptom.

In the following, we first present our method and then explain the alternatives.

How does microsurgical removal of Peyronie's disease plaques with biological reconstruction work?

This method is the technique used by UGRS doctors to treat induratio penis plastica. It is also known as the grafting method in various versions. It is also described as the preferred option in the guidelines of the European Association of Urology (EAU) for severe forms of the disease.

What exactly is done with this method?

The collagen fleece used – should it be used – is also completely remodeled by the body into its own tissue – without scarring. It acts like a biological scaffold that is replaced by the body with healthy tissue.
In order to be able to offer this grafting technique successfully and at low risk, a doctor who is very experienced in reconstructive surgery is absolutely essential for this procedure (Citation: 11, 12)

Simple short-term physiotherapy (a few minutes a day for about two months) helps to make the natural remodeling elastic and prevent new hardening.

In our experience as a tertiary medical center, this method is in most cases the only really sensible surgical solution for induratio penis plastica (Peyronie’s disease).

The advantages of the technique we use are clear and evidence-based:

Special feature with simultaneous erectile dysfunction

If severe cases of Peyronie’s disease are accompanied by severe erectile dysfunction, the operation should be planned differently.

Erectile dysfunction caused by severe induratio penis plastica is usually not significantly improved by grafting surgery alone.

The gold standard in surgical therapy is the use of a hydraulic penile prosthesis (Citation: 11).

What happens with the Nesbit or Essed-Schröder technique (similar to Nesbit) - and what are the disadvantages?

To avoid misunderstandings: we do not use these gathering techniques because we consider them to be disadvantageous. However, the description of these techniques is part of the full explanation:

These techniques date back to the old days, but are still frequently performed because they can be realized within the budget paid by the health insurance companies.

The focus of the disease is left in place with these techniques and, in our experience, the results are poor. Our opinion based on experience has also been scientifically confirmed (Citation: 12).

We don’t think that’s good. For the benefit of the many patients affected, the budget should be increased by politicians and health insurance companies so that more patients can receive modern treatment for their illness.

How does the Nesbit operation work?

What does this mean for the patient?

We fundamentally reject this method because it does not treat the source of the disease, but damages healthy tissue.

Why is the preferred method often not offered?

In general, although the disease is common, only a few operations are performed to treat it. Patients have come to realize that the retraction operations can be of considerable disadvantage.

A quote from Prof. Dr. med. Böhm from the specialist journal Chirurgische Allgemeine (issue 4/2009) sums it up perfectly:

“How often do we send a patient elsewhere because a colleague can do it better? Certainly rarely. Why is that? Because we prefer to offer the other procedure ourselves – even if we can’t do it as well.”

The psychological symptoms should also be treated effectively

Physical treatment should be supplemented by psychological treatment wherever necessary:

Peyronie’s disease is a serious condition that needs to be treated both physically and psychologically. Early, holistic therapy can significantly improve the quality of life (Citation: 15).

How does the treatment begin?

Our secretarial staff will be happy to deal with your inquiries. You can reach them at

Of course, our team of doctors is also available for well-founded second opinions

Costs of reconstruction for induratio penis plastica

Clarity right from the start – without hidden fees.

A high-quality medical service has its price – but with us you know where you stand right from the start. We focus on fair, transparent pricing without unexpected additional costs. Because trust begins with openness.

All prices include examination, preliminary consultation, surgery, anesthesia, aftercare and medical care.

Costs of reconstructive surgery

Payment by bank transfer, credit card, cash or other payment options. Please contact us!

Costs of a corrective operation (after a shirring operation outside the home):

Explanation: It is regrettable that a significantly higher price has to be charged for corrective surgery. However, a correction of a retraction operation is not simply the retraction of a retraction suture, but a double reconstruction. This is because the corpus cavernosum has been permanently damaged by the shirring operation, so that now not only the originally diseased corpus cavernosum is damaged but also the originally healthy one. Correcting this with good results is extremely complex.

Costs covered by private health insurance:

This text is now unfortunately a little longer: A German private patient is often not what he thinks he is. The vast majority of insurance companies will only cover you if the operation takes place in the so-called private ward of a public hospital. Many patients who feel like first-class patients are not allowed to be treated in a private clinic at all. In a privately run public hospital, yes, but that is not a private clinic, it is still a clinic that follows certain budget and administrative guidelines.

It is not uncommon for a private patient to feel special at a doctor’s appointment and in the eyes of general practitioners. There is no difference between a hospital and a clinic, apart from a possibly nicer room, because the operating theatres are the same, the staff are the same and the head doctor is the same, because the head doctor is there anyway, because the department needs a head, even according to the requirements of the statutory healthcare system.

This is neither a criticism of the doctors nor of you the patients, but it makes no sense to raise false hopes.

But there is a way out:

Years ago, we refused to accept that patients were being sold insurance policies that did not include what the patient thought they did.

You and we are not only German citizens, but above all European citizens. And thank goodness European law has created a possibility here which means that a patient who is not entitled to any reimbursement in Germany or only a minimal reimbursement is entitled to a significant reimbursement (up to 90%) for surgery at our center in Spain. This is due to the higher priority of the European law applicable to German patients there.

It is a quite grotesque situation, which can be summarized under the term “German madness”, but it is so. So if you are interested in having your costs reimbursed, please contact us.

The article has been checked, verified and approved by the Co-author Jörg Hagen. Author: Prof. Agustin Fraile Poblador.

About the author

Agustin Fraile Poblador is an international luminary in the field of urological reconstructions. He specializes in inflatable penile prostheses, induratio penis plastica and artificial urethral sphincters.

Activities

His medical positions are in addition to his work at the UGRS Center Darmstadt:

Awards

Agustin Fraile Polabor has been a sought-after speaker at national and international specialist congresses for 20 years and has been recognized for the outstanding quality of his medical work at the following scientific congresses, for example:

Special recognition of his medical work

He has been appointed as an instructor by the European Association of Urology (EAU) at the following congresses:

He is a lecturer and trainer for

Boston Scientific, Coloplast and Promedon for penile prosthesis, artificial urinary sphincter and male suburethral sling. He gives regular training courses in Spain, Poland, Czech Republic, Italy, Turkey, USA, UK, Argentina and the Dominican Republic.

The Center for Advanced Medical Learning and Simulation (CAMLS), Tampa (Fl, USA)

His memberships in addition to the UGRS membership:

Publications

Prof. Agustin Fraile Poblador is the author of more than 40 scientific publications, for example to be found at:

https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/A-Fraile-Poblador-2126490040

The Journal of Urology – American Urological Association

https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/01.JU.0001191460.14228.29.08

Pubmed – National Library of Medicine:

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8511538/

Wiley Online Library – International Journal of Urology

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iju.70285

The medical information provided on this website is for general information purposes only and does not replace a personal consultation with our doctors. As a tertiary medical center, we are also available for second opinions.

© Copyright Jörg Hagen, Doctor

About the author

Jörg Hagen, doctor

The author Jörg Hagen has been the medical director of UGRS International Germany since 1995 and has over 30 years of experience in penis enlargement and complex urological issues. He is regarded as one of the leading experts in the interests of patients in Europe. His international activities, excellent diagnostics and legal successes in patient rights make his assessments particularly well-founded. Patients appreciate his scientifically based, discreet and trustworthy care. His articles are based on many years of practice and well-founded information at the highest level.

List of sources:

1. Ziegelmann MJ, Bajic P, Levine LA. (2020) Peyronie’s disease: Contemporary evaluation and management. Int J Urol. 2020 Jun;27(6):504-516.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

2 Roadman D, Wang V, Beer A, Levine L. (2024) A contemporary assessment of the evaluation and management of patients presenting to a tertiary medical center with Peyronie’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 2024 Apr;36(2):118-124.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

3 Cosentino M, Di Nauta M, Boeri L, Ferraioli G, Lucignani G, Ricapito A, Gadda F, Iafrate M, Mancini M, Dal Moro F, Ruiz-Castañe E, Bettocchi C, Montanari E, Sofikitis N. (2024) Conservative treatment of Peyronie’s disease: a guide. World J Urol. 2024 May 13;42(1):317.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

4 Anderson D, Laforge J, Ross MM, Vanlangendonck R, Hasoon J, Viswanath O, Kaye AD, Urits I. (2022 ) Male Sexual Dysfunction. Health Psychol Res. 2022 Aug 20;10(3):37533.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

5. Reddy AG, Dai MC, Song JJ, Pierce HM, Patel SR, Lipshultz LI. (2023) Peyronie’s Disease: An Outcomes-Based Guide to Non-Surgical and Novel Treatment Modalities. Res Rep Urol. 2023 Feb 2;15:55-67.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

6 Mesquita FC, Barros R, Lima TFN, Velasquez D, Favorito LA, Pozzi E, Dornbush J, Miller D, Petrella F, Ramasamy R. (2024) Evidence of restorative therapies in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease: A narrative review. Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Nov-Dec;50(6):703-713.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

7 Alshuaibi M, Zugail AS, Lombion S, Beley S. (2024) New protocol in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease by combining platelet-rich plasma, percutaneous needle tunneling, and penile modeling: Preliminary results. Fr J Urol. 2024 Jan;34(1):102526.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

8. Li EV, Esterquest R, Pham MN, Panken EJ, Amarasekera C, Siebert A, Bajic P, Levine LA. (2021) Peyronie’s disease: pharmacological treatments and limitations. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jun;14(6):703-713.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

9. Aditya I, Kwong JCC, Krakowsky Y, Grober ED. (2020) Non-conventional therapies for Peyronie’s disease: what is the evidence for efficacy? Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Mar;9(Suppl 2):S295-S302.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

10 Abdel Fattah AAE, Diab T, El-Dakhakhny AS, El Hamshary SA. (2024) Intralesional injection of h.a. compared with v. in acute phase of Peyronie’s disease: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Arab J Urol. 2024 Mar 22;22(4):206-211.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

11 Kadıoğlu A, Gürcan M, Rakhmonovich AF, Dursun M. (2024 ) Surgical management of complex curvature in Peyronie’s disease. World J Urol. 2024 Apr 30;42(1):276.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

12 Chung E. (2020) Penile Reconstructive Surgery in Peyronie’s Disease: Challenges in Restoring Normal Penis Size, Shape, and Function. World J Mens Health. 2020 Jan;38(1):1-8.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

13 Rajamohan N, Kapoor H, Khurana A, Nelson L, Ganesh HS, Khatri G, Nair RT. (2025 ) MR imaging of penile pathology and prostheses. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jan;50(1):305-318.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

14. Şahin A, Babayev H, Cirigliano L, Preto M, Falcone M, Altıntas E, Gül M. (2024 ) Unveiling the molecular hallmarks of Peyronie’s disease: a comprehensive narrative review. Int J Impot Res. 2024 Dec;36(8):801-808.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

15 Goldstein I, Hartzell R, Shabsigh R. (2016) The Impact of Peyronie’s Disease on the Patient: Gaps in Our Current Understanding. J Sex Marital Ther. 2016;42(2):178-90.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

16. Lee HY, Pyun JH, Shim SR, Kim JH. (2024) Medical Treatment for Peyronie’s Disease: Systematic Review and Network Bayesian Meta-Analysis. World J Mens Health. 2024 Jan;42(1):133-147.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

17. Nugteren HM, Nijman JM, de Jong IJ, van Driel MF. (2011) The association between Peyronie’s and Dupuytren’s disease. Int J Impot Res. 2011 Jul-Aug;23(4):142-5.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

18 Shindel AW, Sweet G, Thieu W, Durbin-Johnson B, Rothschild J, Szabo R. (2017) Prevalence of Peyronie’s Disease-Like Symptoms in Men Presenting With Dupuytren Contractures. Sex Med. 2017 Sep;5(3):e135-e141.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

19 Dullea A, Efimenko I, Firdaus F, Griswold A, Arora H, Masterson T, Ramasamy R. (2022 ) Men With Both Peyronie’s and Dupuytren’s Disease. Urology. 2022 Aug;166:76-78.
DOI: Link
PubMed: Link

Your request to us

Felix Jung

Your contact: Felix Jung
Intimate Surgery Office

Mon – Fri from 9.30 am – 7 pm

Alternatively, you can conveniently book an appointment online for a telephone consultation with one of our doctors.

or fill out our contact form:

Kontakt aufnehmen - LPS

Frage

UGRS

Advice & appointments:
Monday – Friday
9.30 am – 7 pm

We regularly ask our patients (anonymously!) about their satisfaction with penis enlargement surgery for internal quality assurance purposes. Previously carried out by external service providers, we now carry out these surveys ourselves so that any problems can be addressed much more effectively.

The last survey (evaluation 11/ 2024), which we conducted using self-designed questionnaires – which are much more useful for us in terms of gaining knowledge than questionnaires formulated by external companies that only have a superficial knowledge of penis enlargement -, carried out about three months after the operation, revealed the following with regard to the 4 main factors:

Satisfaction with on-site support before the operation: 4.9

Professional competence of doctors and staff: 5

Satisfaction with the result: 4.8

Satisfaction with care after the operation: 5

(choice of quality levels 1-5; 50 patients participated randomly and sent in their questionnaires anonymously)

Result: 4.93 out of 5.0

UGRS

Advice & appointments:
Monday – Friday
9.30 am – 7 pm

We regularly ask our patients (anonymously!) about their satisfaction with penis enlargement surgery for internal quality assurance purposes. Previously carried out by external service providers, we now carry out these surveys ourselves so that any problems can be addressed much more effectively.

The last survey (evaluation 11/ 2024), which we conducted using self-designed questionnaires – which are much more useful for us in terms of gaining knowledge than questionnaires formulated by external companies that only have a superficial knowledge of penis enlargement -, carried out about three months after the operation, revealed the following with regard to the 4 main factors:

Satisfaction with on-site support before the operation: 4.9

Professional competence of doctors and staff: 5

Satisfaction with the result: 4.8

Satisfaction with care after the operation: 5

(choice of quality levels 1-5; 50 patients participated randomly and sent in their questionnaires anonymously)

Result: 4.93 out of 5.0